Re: Mailing list clarification

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgus-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Mailing list clarification
Date: 2008-10-29 04:04:35
Message-ID: 200810290004.35360.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgus-general

On Tuesday 28 October 2008 18:40:21 Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> members(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)us : This is a member announce list. It is
> >> moderated. It is also the list I think caused the confusion. This list
> >> is used only to send out occasional communications to the professional
> >> and student members. It is not a "community" list.
> >>
> >> In short the members@ list is for general corporate communications that
> >> are not of a discussion type nature. Discussion should happen on
> >> pgus-general, in all its public and archived glory.
> >>
> >> We could use pgsql-announce for that but I didn't want to spam the
> >> global community for a notice about PgUS voting. Vote results sure but a
> >> standard reminder? Seems like spam to the -announce list.
> >
> > Wouldn't having 'announce' in the email name be clearer?
>
> +1
>
> (as suggested on -advocacy earlier today :)
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{ announce(at)postgresql(dot)us}
{ discuss(at)postgresql(dot)us }
{ board(at)postgresql(dot)us }
O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
o
.

--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com

In response to

Browse pgus-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-10-29 06:09:42 Re: Mailing list clarification
Previous Message Selena Deckelmann 2008-10-28 22:40:21 Re: Mailing list clarification