From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgus-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Mailing list clarification |
Date: | 2008-10-29 04:04:35 |
Message-ID: | 200810290004.35360.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgus-general |
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 18:40:21 Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> members(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)us : This is a member announce list. It is
> >> moderated. It is also the list I think caused the confusion. This list
> >> is used only to send out occasional communications to the professional
> >> and student members. It is not a "community" list.
> >>
> >> In short the members@ list is for general corporate communications that
> >> are not of a discussion type nature. Discussion should happen on
> >> pgus-general, in all its public and archived glory.
> >>
> >> We could use pgsql-announce for that but I didn't want to spam the
> >> global community for a notice about PgUS voting. Vote results sure but a
> >> standard reminder? Seems like spam to the -announce list.
> >
> > Wouldn't having 'announce' in the email name be clearer?
>
> +1
>
> (as suggested on -advocacy earlier today :)
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{ announce(at)postgresql(dot)us}
{ discuss(at)postgresql(dot)us }
{ board(at)postgresql(dot)us }
O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
o
.
--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-10-29 06:09:42 | Re: Mailing list clarification |
Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2008-10-28 22:40:21 | Re: Mailing list clarification |