From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Spam filtering on the mailing lists |
Date: | 2008-07-17 18:11:18 |
Message-ID: | 20080717150757.M69138@fserv.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>>> I can change the quarantining to be >4 if ppl want, which should
>>>> greatly reduce the # of messages going through ...
>>>
>>> Sounds like a good idea to me.
>>
>> 'k, I'll put it down to 4 tonight, and increase the frequency I check for
>> false-positives accordingly, to make sure that I don't get a big spike as
>> a result ...
>
> Hmm, I think keeping it at 5 is a good idea, seeing how 2 of those were
> being substracted by the AWL and you've just cleared that.
>
> Maybe what we need is a way to remove a particular domain from the AWL
> instead?
Actually, I was thinking of disabling the AWL feature altogether ... it
might make a few extra false-positives to need to release, but I doubt it
will make a huge difference ...
Maybe disable AWL and leave score threshold at 5 ... ? I can adjust
after, based on # of false positives ... if false positives don't go up,
then without AWL causes no adverse problems ... then I can look at
adjusting score threshold down while watching for false-positives ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-07-17 18:15:56 | Re: Spam filtering on the mailing lists |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-07-17 15:54:41 | Re: Spam filtering on the mailing lists |