Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date: 2008-07-07 14:03:40
Message-ID: 20080707140340.GD21091@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>> I looked this over and it looks good in general.  I was only wondering
>> about for single-column indexes -- we're storing attribute numbers too,
>> right?
> No, GinState->oneCol field signals to GinFormTuple and  
> gin_index_getattr/gintuple_get_attrnum about actual storage.
>
> Single column index is binary compatible with current index :)

Ah, neat!

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-07-07 14:33:35
Subject: Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output
Previous:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2008-07-07 13:58:17
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2008-07-07 14:33:42
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP
Previous:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2008-07-07 13:58:17
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group