Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> >> May 14 21:38:40 sfphotodb001 postgres: [20-1] 2008-05-14 21:38:40
> >> PDTLOG: parameter "shared_buffers" cannot be changed after server start;
> >> configuration file change ignored
> >> The message probably should be rephrased to say that this setting
> >> (shared_buffers) will not be changed.
> > Actually, no one else has been confused by this wording before, and I
> > can't think of better wording that doesn't sound redundant.
> How about "... after server start; change ignored" ?
> Or "attempted change ignored" ?
Yea, I like "change ignored" rather than mentioning the configuration
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2008-06-30 23:02:04|
|Subject: Re: Confusing message in log file|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-06-30 22:50:21|
|Subject: Re: Confusing message in log file |