Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: autonomous transactions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autonomous transactions
Date: 2008-01-30 17:11:14
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus escribió:
> All,
>> Added to TODO:
>> * Add anonymous transactions
> IMHO, autonomous transactions should be part of a package with a  
> spec-compliant CREATE PROCEDURE statement.

IMHO we should try to get both things separately, otherwise we will
never get either.

Alvaro Herrera                      
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-30 17:19:22
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-01-30 17:04:28
Subject: Re: autonomous transactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group