Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: autonomous transactions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autonomous transactions
Date: 2008-01-30 17:11:14
Message-ID: 20080130171114.GM4536@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus escribió:
> All,
>
>>
>> Added to TODO:
>>
>> * Add anonymous transactions
>>
>>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00893.php
>
> IMHO, autonomous transactions should be part of a package with a  
> spec-compliant CREATE PROCEDURE statement.

IMHO we should try to get both things separately, otherwise we will
never get either.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-30 17:19:22
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-01-30 17:04:28
Subject: Re: autonomous transactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group