On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:55:53PM +0000, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > Dean,
> > Maybe I missed something obvious here, but how does this patch handle
> > the situation where people have turned on INTEGER_DATETIMES?
> > Cheers,
> > David.
> > --
> > David Fetter http://fetter.org/
> > Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
> > Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
> > Remember to vote!
> > Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> Sorry, I don't understand. I am new to this code, but I can't see
> how the INTEGER_DATETIMES flag will affect this code. I am using the
> macros and functions from instrument.h and explain.c for timing,
> which appear to use gettimeofday() or QueryPerformanceCounter(),
> coverting the result to a double to report the total time spent
> running the query.
It's the double part I don't quite get. Shouldn't that be an int64 in
the case of INTEGER_DATETIMES?
> As far as I can see, the INTEGER_DATETIMES flag doesn't affect this
> code. Am I missing something?
> Free games, great prizes - get gaming at Gamesbox.
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-01-28 20:20:59|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Friendly help for psql |
|Previous:||From: Dean Rasheed||Date: 2008-01-28 19:55:53|
|Subject: Re: Auto-explain patch|