Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 16:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Paranoia would
> > suggest forbidding *any* form of ALTER TABLE when there are pending
> > trigger events, but maybe that's unnecessarily strong.
> That works for me. Such a combination makes no sense, so banning it is
> the right thing to do.
I disagree. This is an implementation limitation, so it makes sense to
try to restrict the user as least as possible.
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2008-01-03 14:39:26|
|Subject: Re: Autovacuum & Table List Ordering|
|Previous:||From: Glyn Astill||Date: 2008-01-03 13:39:56|