Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 16:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Paranoia would
> > suggest forbidding *any* form of ALTER TABLE when there are pending
> > trigger events, but maybe that's unnecessarily strong.
>
> That works for me. Such a combination makes no sense, so banning it is
> the right thing to do.
I disagree. This is an implementation limitation, so it makes sense to
try to restrict the user as least as possible.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Alvaro Herrera | Date: 2008-01-03 14:39:26 |
| Subject: Re: Autovacuum & Table List Ordering |
| Previous: | From: Glyn Astill | Date: 2008-01-03 13:39:56 |
| Subject: |