-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:30:55 +0000
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Alexandru Cârstoiu <alexandru(dot)carstoiu(at)excelsarc(dot)ro> writes:
> > This tells me that the v3 protocol appeared at 7.4, so there's no
> > need to support v2 in future database versions (starting with
> > 8.3?). It would simplify code in interfaces like JDBC too.
> I think the second half of this is correct. There would be no need to
> support the old protocol in client interface drivers since the only
> supported databases would all support the new protocol.
Except that we just broke the proposed upgrade path if we do that...
Let's not put people in a catch-22.
Joshua D. Drake
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2007-11-28 16:22:48|
|Subject: Re: Time to update list of contributors|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2007-11-28 16:20:46|
|Subject: Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL|