Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Date: 2007-09-28 15:56:51
Message-ID: 200709281156.51856.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Friday 28 September 2007 11:28, David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Brian Hurt wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > >JD,
> > >
> > >>Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre
> > >>junk and just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.
> > >
> > >I think PG is trademarked by the Motion Picture Association of
> > >America.  And you *know* you don't want to tangle with their
> > >attorneys.
> > >
> > >;-)
> > >
> > >I vote for "UltimateDB".
> >
> > Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres".
>
> +1 ;)
>

Sorry, I have to disagree. I don't think it is clear what the Digres project 
would be.  Now if you went with DigreSQL, then I'm on board. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-09-28 16:05:57
Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2007-09-28 15:55:39
Subject: Re: Cafeconf 2007

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group