Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)
Date: 2007-06-01 18:40:55
Message-ID: 200706011840.l51Iet502993@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm sorry guys but I don't agree this is a TODO item.
> ...
> > Also, methinks we should have agreed behaviour before we make something
> > a TODO item.
> 
> There is a whole *lot* of stuff in the TODO list that does not have a
> consensus solution yet.  You should not imagine that it's gospel.
> 
> At the same time, it'd be better if this item were worded more like
> "investigate this issue" rather than presupposing a particular
> form of answer.

OK, new wording:

        o Research self-referential UPDATEs that see inconsistent row versions
          in read-committed mode

          http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00507.php

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-06-01 18:53:54
Subject: Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updatinganupdatable view)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-06-01 18:23:38
Subject: Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group