Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL.

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL.
Date: 2007-05-30 21:18:33
Message-ID: 20070530211833.GA17639@phlogiston.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:42:08PM -0300, Fernando Ike de Oliveira wrote:
> was 99,7% but considering the current necessities, change percentual
> to 99,99%. I think in solution probability  pgpool-2 or Heartbeat +
> GFS. The PostgreSQL servers will be in different physical places. 

I would be very interested to see a set-up that can actually
guarantee 99.99% uptime across a wide area link.  What write speeds
do you need in the database?  What is your tolerance for loss of
committed data?

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
		--H.W. Fowler

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-05-30 21:23:27
Subject: Re: pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: compressed data is corrupt
Previous:From: gonzalesDate: 2007-05-30 19:51:39
Subject: Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group