Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > > It'd be nice to have a NOTICE printed when a wait-on-lock takes longer
> > > than a few seconds.
> > It'd be relatively painless to make that happen as part of the
> > deadlock-check timeout function, but that's typically only a one-second
> > delay not a "few seconds". I think it'd likely be overly chatty.
> Yeah, I wouldn't want one per second.
It's not one per second, it's after one second (actually
deadlock_timeout) has elapsed since you started to sleep waiting for a
lock. If a deadlock is not detected the process won't be awakened
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-05-30 16:43:58|
|Subject: Re: TOAST usage setting|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-05-30 16:27:22|
|Subject: Re: 'Waiting on lock' |