Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 2. decide that the standard is braindead and just omit dumping the
> grantor when it's no longer available, but don't remove
> Which do people feel should be implemented? I can do whatever we
> decide; if no one has a strong opinion on the matter, my opinion is we
> do (2) which is the easiest.
Here is a patch implementing this idea, vaguely based on Russell's.
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2007-05-15 00:21:00|
|Subject: Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?|
|Previous:||From: Richard Huxton||Date: 2007-05-14 21:26:58|
|Subject: Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view|
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-05-15 00:17:28|
|Subject: Re: postgresql locks up over the net |
|Previous:||From: Peter T. Breuer||Date: 2007-05-14 22:31:00|
|Subject: postgresql locks up over the net|