Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

which distro, or to build

From: David Bear <David(dot)Bear(at)asu(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: which distro, or to build
Date: 2007-03-21 00:50:21
Message-ID: 20070321005021.GD20160@asu.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
I'm getting really mad at RHEL 4. They do not package a recent
postgres in the base distro, and only put 8.1.x in a disk call
lamp-beta... So now I wonder what a 'recommended' way of running
postgresql is -- meaning, any linux distro will do, just build it --
or is there any particular distro that 'does the right thing' with
postgresql... meaning, they package recent versions and keep them
updated with security fixes...

I was using Suse 9.3 . They did a pretty good job -- at least they
included pg 8.0 and kept it updated. RHEL just stinks. I suppose a
I've come to like the way yast keeps packages together, helps resolve
dependancies, etc. I switch to RHEL for 'enterprise' reasons. There is
some central support for it though I have yet to figure out if that
extends beyond just buying a site license for it..

Anyway, I'd appreciate any pointers on which system seems to be best
suited for making life easier for a pg system admin. 

btw, I have run pg on FreeBSD as well, and relied on the ports
maintainers to keep things updated. cvsupdate seemed to work
reasonably well for this.

Any advice? use packages.. build.. or ?
-- 
David Bear
phone: 	602-496-0424
fax: 	602-496-0955
College of Public Programs/ASU
University Center Rm 622
411 N Central
Phoenix, AZ 85007-0685
 "Beware the IP portfolio, everyone will be suspect of trespassing"

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Joshua KramerDate: 2007-03-21 01:06:35
Subject: Re: which distro, or to build
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-03-21 00:01:33
Subject: Re: WAL based backup/recovery clarifications

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group