Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date: 2007-02-23 19:56:29
Message-ID: 200702232056.30030.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
> comments.

The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with 
Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?".  I don't think "Can I use 
this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar 
interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Dmitry KoterovDate: 2007-02-23 19:59:00
Subject: Re: BUG #3048: pg_dump dumps intarray metadata incorrectly
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-23 18:38:26
Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Rich TeerDate: 2007-02-23 20:08:03
Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-23 18:38:26
Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group