Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp
Date: 2007-02-03 22:20:45
Message-ID: 200702032220.l13MKjo25268@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck wrote:
> I don't have any such paper and the proof of concept will be the 
> implementation of the system. I do however see enough resistance against 
> this proposal to withdraw the commit timestamp at this time. The new 
> replication system will therefore require the installation of a patched, 
> non-standard PostgreSQL version, compiled from sources cluster wide in 
> order to be used. I am aware that this will dramatically reduce it's 
> popularity but it is impossible to develop this essential feature as an 
> external module.
> 
> I thank everyone for their attention.

Going and working on it on your own doesn't seem like the proper
solution.  I don't see people objecting to adding it, but they want it
work, which I am sure you want too.  You have to show how it will work
and convince others of that, and then you have a higher chance it will
work, and be in the PostgreSQL codebase.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-02-03 22:25:17
Subject: Re: Proposal: Change of pg_trigger.tg_enabled and adding
Previous:From: Theo SchlossnagleDate: 2007-02-03 22:19:15
Subject: Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group