Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: cluster or database?

From: Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: cluster or database?
Date: 2007-01-28 14:25:17
Message-ID: 20070128142517.GA24908@cns.vt.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:42:52PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 14:32:37 -0500,
>   Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> wrote:
> > Is there a drawback to have different clusters on the same
> > system/diskspace?   I have different applications I want to support
> > initially on the same server/disk array.  I was thinking it would be
> > better/easier to have seperate clusters per app for ease of migration
> > and security.  Is it highly superior just to use different dbs?  Why?
> > Where is this discussed?  Thanks.
> 
> The downside to multiple clusters is that is harder to configure them
> to play nice with each other in the way of resource utilization because
> they don't communicate with each other.


Thank you for responding.  Do you have any documentation that would
support my efforts to understand some of the issues?

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-28 14:28:47
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-01-28 14:22:49
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group