Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: cluster or database?

From: Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: cluster or database?
Date: 2007-01-28 14:25:17
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:42:52PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 14:32:37 -0500,
>   Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> wrote:
> > Is there a drawback to have different clusters on the same
> > system/diskspace?   I have different applications I want to support
> > initially on the same server/disk array.  I was thinking it would be
> > better/easier to have seperate clusters per app for ease of migration
> > and security.  Is it highly superior just to use different dbs?  Why?
> > Where is this discussed?  Thanks.
> The downside to multiple clusters is that is harder to configure them
> to play nice with each other in the way of resource utilization because
> they don't communicate with each other.

Thank you for responding.  Do you have any documentation that would
support my efforts to understand some of the issues?

In response to


pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-28 14:28:47
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-01-28 14:22:49
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group