On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:12:45 +0100
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:04:40PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > Now it certainly seems to me that it should behave as described given
> > the definition of VACUUM FULL so I am a little confused by my tests.
> > My test table only has two entries in it. Is that the issue? In fact,
> > I find the same behaviour if I do a simple VACUUM on the table.
> On a table with two entries, VACUUM FULL is going to do nothing of
> interest. Moving tuples within a page is useless, generally.
I thought that that might be the issue. The docs should probably say
"can" instead of "will" then.
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Edwin Ramirez||Date: 2006-12-26 17:50:19|
|Subject: WITH support|
|Previous:||From: Michael Fuhr||Date: 2006-12-26 17:23:52|
|Subject: Re: Possible documentation error|