> The thing I would ask is would you not be better
> with SAS drives?
> Since the comments on Dell, and the highlighted
> issues I have been
> looking at HP and the the Smart Array P600
> controller with 512 BBWC.
> Although I am looking to stick with the 8 internal
> disks, rather than
> use external ones.
> The HP Smart Array 50 is the external array for SAS
> drives. Not
> really looked into it much though.
The Smart Array 50 supports a maximum of 10 disks and
has a single I/O module, while the Smart Array 30
supports up to 14 disks and can be configured with a
dual I/O module.
I was under the assumption that SAS runs at the same
speed as Ultra320, in which case the Smart Array 30 is
a better bet...
Thanks for your feedback.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Markus Schaber||Date: 2006-10-23 13:25:49|
|Subject: Re: Index on two columns not used|
|Previous:||From: Markus Schaber||Date: 2006-10-23 09:27:41|
|Subject: Re: Best COPY Performance|