Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)sun(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Date: 2006-10-01 16:27:16
Message-ID: 200610011227.16736.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Monday 24 July 2006 17:00, Robert Lor wrote:
> Excellent! I'll submit a doc patch shortly.
>
> Regards,
> -Robert
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >I've committed the dtrace patch. Some documentation would be nice now ...
>

Looking through -patches I don't see the doc patch, and outside of
installation.sgml there doesn't seem to be anything either. Robert, are you
still on the hook for these? Also should installation.sgml mention the
issueswith building 32 vs 64 bit binaries and/or the issue with static
functions?

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-01 19:00:28 Re: libedit broke in head
Previous Message Jeremy Drake 2006-10-01 08:09:54 src/tools/msvc usage instructions

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2006-10-01 17:54:57 minor improvements in messages
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-09-30 18:29:55 Re: adminpack