On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:44:24 -0400
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I'm not sure about 'money' in general but these claims of great
> performance improvments over numeric just don't fly so easily with me.
> numeric isn't all *that* much slower than regular old integer in the
> tests that I've done.
Numeric has been shown to be as good or better than money in I/O
operations. Where money shines is in internal calculations.
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-09-28 17:24:30|
|Subject: Re: Coding style for emacs|
|Previous:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2006-09-28 17:04:30|
|Subject: Re: Row IS NULL question|