Re: Thought provoking piece on NetBSD

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PgSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thought provoking piece on NetBSD
Date: 2006-09-01 15:50:36
Message-ID: 200609011150.37388.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 31 August 2006 14:41, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > We do have portions of a meritocracy in place but we are by no means
> > mature in that arena. Likely because of our lock problem ;)
>
> What specific issues do you see? We're pretty strongly merit-based -- the
> only reservation I see on that is a bias toward more eloquent writers
> having disproprotionate influence. But I don't see any way to avoid that.
>

I think some members of this community confuse volunteerism with meritocracy.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2006-09-01 16:03:11 Re: Thought provoking piece on NetBSD
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-09-01 15:07:58 Re: PostgreSQL rebranding

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Murtagh 2006-09-01 15:55:32 Array comparison - subset
Previous Message Silvela, Jaime (Exchange) 2006-09-01 15:41:51 pg_statistic corruption and duplicated primary keys

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-01 15:50:54 Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2006-09-01 15:49:17 Re: Sort performance