Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Time to scale up?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,"Pgsql-Advocacy(at)Postgresql(dot)Org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to scale up?
Date: 2006-07-26 14:34:25
Message-ID: 20060726143425.GC5187@surnet.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>
> >>Which version of Replication do we throw in here?
> >>
> >IMHO, the current players should be encouraged create a joint portfolio 
> >that makes sense. 
> 
> All due respect   but that is a pipe dream.

Why?  The current players list reduces to

1. Slony-I

So it's not that difficult to get them to agree with themselves.


The other possible players are all excused:

- DBmirror: the author considers it obsolete
- Postgres-R: it's still under development
- erServer: obsolete, abandoned, inferior to Slony-I anyway
- Mammoth Replicator: proprietary

Am I missing anyone?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2006-07-26 14:35:57
Subject: Re: Time to scale up?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-07-26 14:05:46
Subject: Re: Time to scale up?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2006-07-26 14:35:57
Subject: Re: Time to scale up?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-07-26 14:05:46
Subject: Re: Time to scale up?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group