Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)sun(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Date: 2006-07-23 19:50:39
Message-ID: 200607232150.39692.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Robert Lor wrote:
> Regarding where to put probe.d, will src/probe.d work since probes
> for all subsystems will go into this one file.

As I understand this, the probe file is compiled into some sort of
object file which is linked into the binary. So if we ever have probes
in other components, we'd probably want to have separate probe source
and object files for them. That would seem better than one big probe
file that is linked in everywhere.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2006-07-23 21:21:33 Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-23 18:10:26 Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Lor 2006-07-24 01:00:31 Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2006-07-22 22:37:07 Re: Mark change-on-restart-only values in postgresql.conf