Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
Date: 2006-05-11 02:08:13
Message-ID: 200605110208.k4B28DS04908@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Well we did have a bug report by Peter Brant, and a test by him with the
> >> patch that fixes it, so it seems it should be applied. The URLs I
> >> posted had that information.
>
> > Correction. It only goes into 8.0.X and 8.1.X. CVS HEAD has a
> > rewritten file.
>
> That seems a bit scary --- patching stable branches with a patch that
> will get zero testing in HEAD? I think some more testing besides
> Peter's would be smart first. What if the patch behaves differently
> on different versions of Windows, for instance?

We can wait for someone else to report the problem. I think it only
happened on Win2003 SP1.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2006-05-11 02:43:32 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-05-11 01:57:44 Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation