Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory
Date: 2006-04-27 17:57:06
Message-ID: 20060427175704.GI31328@mathom.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:50:16PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>Yes, but some dedicated storage devices actually provide good
>performance with RAID5. Most simpler solutions give pretty abysmal write
>performance.

dedicated storage device != SAN != NAS. You can get good performance in 
a dedicated direct-attach device without paying for the SAN/NAS 
infrastructure if you don't need it; you don't have to go right from EMC 
to PERC with nothing in the middle.

Mike Stone

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bealach-na BoDate: 2006-04-27 18:12:01
Subject: Why so slow?
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-04-27 17:50:16
Subject: Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group