Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 12:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > That seems like a frammish without sufficient use-case. You can always
> > quit and restart psql to get back to the defaults.
> Patch applied to HEAD.
> If folks want to argue for the ability to instruct psql to use the libpq
> default for a parameter, I'm not fundamentally opposed, but that change
> can be made subsequently.
I think what is applied is enough. That +/- syntax was too confusing to
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Mark Wong||Date: 2006-04-03 15:08:29|
|Subject: Re: WIP: splitting BLCKSZ|
|Previous:||From: David Wheeler||Date: 2006-04-03 01:22:29|
|Subject: Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?|