Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP: further sorting speedup

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: further sorting speedup
Date: 2006-02-23 02:21:38
Message-ID: 20060223022138.GT86022@pervasive.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:40:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "tape".  This increases the space needed by 8 or 12 bytes (depending on
> sizeof(Datum)) per in-memory tuple, but doesn't cost anything as far as

Stupid question... how are varlena's handled in Datum?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-23 03:18:48
Subject: Re: WIP: further sorting speedup
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-02-23 00:56:54
Subject: Re: OS X shared memory documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group