On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 04:02:26AM -0500, Robert Bernier wrote:
> On Monday 16 January 2006 15:30, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > The problem with using colation order is that it's database-wide. If you
> > then need case-sensitive ordering on some field you're outa luck. If you
> > could define colation on a per-field basis it would be a bit different.
> > I'm also not sure what this has to do with advocacy...
> I posted here because of the nature of the question. Which mail-list do you think this is most appropriate?
-general; maybe -hackers if it was a specific call for action.
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Tomka Gergely||Date: 2006-01-18 07:41:09|
|Subject: Re: Case studies (was: [PERFORM] big databases &|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-01-17 21:18:37|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and case insensitivity...|