| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and case insensitivity... |
| Date: | 2006-01-17 21:18:37 |
| Message-ID: | 200601172118.k0HLIbA15469@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert Bernier wrote:
> On Monday 16 January 2006 15:30, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > The problem with using colation order is that it's database-wide. If you
> > then need case-sensitive ordering on some field you're outa luck. If you
> > could define colation on a per-field basis it would be a bit different.
> >
> > I'm also not sure what this has to do with advocacy...
>
>
> I posted here because of the nature of the question. Which mail-list do you think this is most appropriate?
I have trouble understanding how this matches "advocacy" in your mind.
Anyway, general would be best for this.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-17 22:40:31 | Re: PostgreSQL and case insensitivity... |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-17 20:34:01 | Case studies (was: [PERFORM] big databases & hospitals]) |