Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The basic problem is that with two deterministic flags the default
> > values for those flags are unclear.
> 
> That's a really good point ... the only explainable default would be
> that both are --without, which is a crummy default.
> 
> I think the way that Bruce's patch works is fine, only the name of the
> switch needs tweaking ;-)

Already renamed and patch posted:

  --with-bonjour          build with Bonjour support
  --with-openssl          build with OpenSSL support
  --with-libedit-preferred  prefer libedit over readline
  --without-readline      do not use Readline

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? at 2005-12-02 18:32:42 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? at 2005-12-02 18:47:18 from Tom Lane

pgsql-ports by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2005-12-02 18:47:18
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 18:38:10
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 18:42:40
	Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 18:38:10
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 18:42:40
	Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 18:38:10
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?