Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Date: 2005-12-01 05:15:59
Message-ID: 20051201051559.GA27630@fetter.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:56:33PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, David Fetter wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:23:38PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> >>On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:40, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>Personally I expect to keep supporting 7.3 for a long while,
> >>>because Red Hat pays me to ;-) ... and the EOL date for RHEL3 is a
> >>>long way away yet.  The PG community may stop bothering with 7.3
> >>>releases before that.  But I think Marc and Bruce figure "as long
> >>>as the patches are in our CVS we may as well put out a release".
> >>
> >>Yeah, thats one of the reasons I am skeptical about having official
> >>policies on this type of thing.
> >
> >I see this as an excellent reason to draw a bright, sharp line between
> >what vendors support and what the community as a whole does,
> >especially where individual community members wear another hat.
> 
> So, if Sun, SRA, Pervasive, Command Prompt, etc were to submit a patch for 
> v7.2, we'd refuse it?

That depends on what you mean by "refuse."  Such a patch wouldn't
resurrect the original Postgres with POSTQUEL and cause us to support
it, and it won't cause us to start supporting PostgreSQL 7.2 again
either.

That said, there's a backports project on pgfoundry.  We could see
about something like an "attic" project for such patches, etc.  This
way, the community doesn't get albatrosses draped over its neck, and
the patches are available for those interested :)

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2005-12-01 10:06:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-12-01 04:22:52
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2005-12-01 07:13:05
Subject: Re: A couple of proposed pgbench changes
Previous:From: Qingqing ZhouDate: 2005-12-01 05:09:03
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group