Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
Date: 2005-10-29 00:34:11
Message-ID: 200510281734.11285.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Folks,

Are foreign keys on temp tables not allowed just because nobody requested 
them, or because they're hard to do?

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-10-29 03:47:36
Subject: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ...
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2005-10-28 22:50:17
Subject: Re: TODO for plpgsql: RETURN should accept arbitrary composite expressions

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-10-29 04:27:47
Subject: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
Previous:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2005-10-28 22:10:19
Subject: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group