Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Volkan YAZICI <volkan(dot)yazici(at)gmail(dot)com>,pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
Date: 2005-10-16 18:21:31
Message-ID: 200510161821.j9GILVO29383@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Really?  Do we intend applications to call it?
> 
> > Uh, well, we never call it ourselves, so if we don't expect other
> > applications to call it, why is it there?
> 
> If it's intended for apps to call, how was the patch initially accepted
> with no documentation?

Not sure.  That's why its history needs to be researched.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Volkan YAZICIDate: 2005-10-16 19:30:29
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-10-16 17:52:29
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-16 18:26:05
Subject: Re: small typo
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-10-16 18:07:21
Subject: Re: small typo

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group