Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Volkan YAZICI <volkan(dot)yazici(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
Date: 2005-10-16 18:21:31
Message-ID: 200510161821.j9GILVO29383@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Really? Do we intend applications to call it?
>
> > Uh, well, we never call it ourselves, so if we don't expect other
> > applications to call it, why is it there?
>
> If it's intended for apps to call, how was the patch initially accepted
> with no documentation?

Not sure. That's why its history needs to be researched.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Volkan YAZICI 2005-10-16 19:30:29 Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-16 17:52:29 Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-16 18:26:05 Re: small typo
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-16 18:07:21 Re: small typo