Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close hackers-win32?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close hackers-win32?
Date: 2005-09-20 01:17:26
Message-ID: 200509200117.j8K1HQA09164@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > It occurs to me that there is no longer any great need to
> > have a separate hackers list for win32 development. Perhaps
> > we should close it down now and keep all development on -hackers?
>
> I also think this is a good idea. The number of "win32 only issues of
> -hacker level" is significantly smaller now, and having to bounce people
> between the lists can be kind of annoying...

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Samik Raychaudhuri 2005-09-22 15:01:40 Re: Postgres 7.4.5 fails with Cygwin 1.5.18-1 (core dump)
Previous Message Felipe Fernandez 2005-09-19 20:13:35 LC_Messages

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Kirpa 2005-09-20 02:11:31 Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2005-09-20 00:47:39 Re: 64-bit API for large objects

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mehul Doshi-A20614 2006-01-24 21:21:24 Re: Query on support for trigger functions defined in a Shared library in Windows
Previous Message Reini Urban 2005-09-18 11:07:51 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close pgsql-cygwin?