Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1854: SQL Bug

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Christian Almeida <cbalmeida(at)gmail(dot)com>,pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1854: SQL Bug
Date: 2005-08-29 16:25:58
Message-ID: 20050829162558.GB32443@wolff.to (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:11:06 -0700,
  Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Christian Almeida wrote:
> 
> > Should this sql work?
> 
> Yes and no. ;)  Whether this errors or adds the reference is controlled by
> a configuration variable, add_missing_from.  For backwards compatibility
> reasons (and for allowing outside table references in delete) the variable
> currently defaults to on IIRC.  At some point in the future the default
> will likely change to off.

Unless things change it will be off by default in 8.1. This is mentioned
in the release notes. There is now a USING clause for DELETE which covers
the case that couldn't previously be handled without the missing from
feature.

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2005-08-29 16:27:34
Subject: Re: BUG #1854: SQL Bug
Previous:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2005-08-29 16:11:06
Subject: Re: BUG #1854: SQL Bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group