From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net, scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Stuff running slooow |
Date: | 2005-08-25 21:01:23 |
Message-ID: | 20050825180005.T1044@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:07:32PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Magnus Hagander"<mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
>> Sent: 25/08/05 19:36:51
>> To: "Jim C. Nasby"<jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
>> Cc: "Marc G. Fournier"<scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org"<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Stuff running slooow
>>
>>> Picking one that does, thouhg, my mails
>>> typicall pass through a box at
>>> commandprompt.com, so the argument
>>> holds while the example was broken.
>>
>> There are a few distribution servers, another of which is the Pervasive box.
>
> So I take it the bottleneck is the box running the mailing list?
>
> BTW, things are back to normal today...
Yup, did a bunch of work on it last night ... identified some 'out of
whack' processes that were hogging a bit more CPU then they should, and
moved them ... its part of some ongoing work I've been doing to clean
things up ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-08-25 21:02:55 | Re: Stuff running slooow |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-08-25 20:46:19 | Re: Stuff running slooow |