Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
> What would people think of adding a note to the ROW SHARE section of
> Table-Level Locks remarking on the fact that referential integrity
> checks expressed through foreign keys do SELECT ... FOR UPDATES.
> It was somewhat challenging today to try to track down a pervasive
> locking issue related to a table not directly referenced in a stored
> procedure but that was referenced by a key in a table that was being
> I'm not sure how this changes with the new shared row locking
> implementation in 8.1...
8.1 will use _shared_ row locks for such cases.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Halley Pacheco de Oliveira||Date: 2005-07-26 10:06:42|
|Subject: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 Documentation - Chapter 23. Monitoring Database Activity|
|Previous:||From: Thomas F. O'Connell||Date: 2005-07-21 21:00:43|
|Subject: Re: Beta Docs|