From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Occupied port warning |
Date: | 2005-06-28 13:54:43 |
Message-ID: | 20050628135443.GA6999@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 03:14:29PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > IIRC, in previous versions any bind failure was fatal, but in 8.0 we
> > decided to be slightly more forgiving and only bail out if we failed
> > to bind at all.
>
> I realize that, but I would like to know where that bright idea came
> from in violation of all other principles of this and any other
> software. I recall that it had something to do with IPv6, but I'm not
> sure.
If the TCP socket is used we can still bind to the Unix-domain socket,
no?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"Vivir y dejar de vivir son soluciones imaginarias.
La existencia está en otra parte" (Andre Breton)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-28 13:56:28 | Re: Occupied port warning |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-28 13:51:20 | Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger |