Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Occupied port warning

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Occupied port warning
Date: 2005-06-28 13:54:43
Message-ID: 20050628135443.GA6999@surnet.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 03:14:29PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > IIRC, in previous versions any bind failure was fatal, but in 8.0 we
> > decided to be slightly more forgiving and only bail out if we failed
> > to bind at all.
> 
> I realize that, but I would like to know where that bright idea came 
> from in violation of all other principles of this and any other 
> software.  I recall that it had something to do with IPv6, but I'm not 
> sure.

If the TCP socket is used we can still bind to the Unix-domain socket,
no?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"Vivir y dejar de vivir son soluciones imaginarias.
La existencia está en otra parte" (Andre Breton)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-06-28 13:56:28
Subject: Re: Occupied port warning
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-06-28 13:51:20
Subject: Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group