Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Select performance vs. mssql

From: mark durrant <markd89(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Select performance vs. mssql
Date: 2005-05-24 05:47:15
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-performance

I have some experience with MSSQL and am examining
PostgreSQL. I'm running under Windows. I like what I
see so far, but I'm hoping for some performance

1. My test database has 7 million records. 
2. There are two columns - an integer and a char
column called Day which has a random value of Mon or
Tues, etc. in it.
3. I made an index on Day.

My query is:

select count(*) from mtable where day='Mon'


1. P3 600 512MB RAM MSSQL. It takes about 4-5 secs to
run. If I run a few queries and everything is cached,
it is sometimes  just 1 second.

2. Athlon 1.3 Ghz 1GB RAM. PostgreSQL takes 7 seconds.
I have played with the buffers setting and currently
have it at 7500. At 20000 it took over 20 seconds to

5 seconds vs 7 isn't that big of a deal, but 1 second
vs 7 seconds is. Also, the slower performance is with
much lesser hardware.

Any ideas to try?

Thanks much,

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-05-24 06:18:36
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Previous:From: Anjan DaveDate: 2005-05-23 22:35:44
Subject: Re: seqential vs random io

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group