From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "C(dot) Bensend" <benny(at)bennyvision(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: brute force attacking the password |
Date: | 2005-04-19 11:23:04 |
Message-ID: | 20050419112304.GB10314@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 16:55:45 -0400,
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I would like to pick something that matches what a typical Unix system
> does because I think the _fancy_ solutions actually cause weird problems
> like denial-of-service attacks by just trying to log in.
>
> How do typical open source Unix's handle it? It think they slow down
> prompting for a password --- but as I remember we only allow one
> password attempt per connection so that is already covered.
Can't people use PAM to get this effect if they want it?
For most people password guessing isn't going to be a big problem as
the database won't be accessible from totally untrusted places and watching
the log files for guessing will probably be a good enough solution.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wim Bertels | 2005-04-19 13:12:58 | Re: brute force attacking the password |
Previous Message | Nikhil Pant | 2005-04-19 10:00:09 | Installing PostGres |