Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

pgsql: If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[]

From: tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[]
Date: 2005-04-08 14:18:36
Message-ID: 20050408141836.1583953217@svr1.postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Log Message:
-----------
If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[] overrun,
it must occur *before* we get into the critical state of holding a
lock we have no place to record.  Per discussion with Qingqing Zhou.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr:
        lwlock.c (r1.26 -> r1.27)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c.diff?r1=1.26&r2=1.27)

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: User CmajDate: 2005-04-08 15:20:59
Subject: pgaccess - pgaccess: latest version from Robert Strong, with licensing
Previous:From: User DpageDate: 2005-04-08 08:05:03
Subject: pginstaller - pginst: Prep for 8.0.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group