Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Date: 2005-03-24 02:11:46
Message-ID: 200503240211.j2O2BkQ24635@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > Tom> We should do that *only* when an ISO (not ANSI)
> > Just to clarify, is that a distinction or just a clarification? (ie
> > are ANSI and ISO SQL different?)
>
> There is no "ANSI SQL". Only ISO SQL. ANSI never issued their own
> spec to my knowledge ... unlike, say, C, where I believe ANSI C was
> in fact issued by ANSI.

TODO updated.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-03-24 03:39:27 Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2005-03-24 00:02:33 Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,