Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Date: 2005-03-24 02:11:46
Message-ID: 200503240211.j2O2BkQ24635@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> >     Tom> We should do that *only* when an ISO (not ANSI)
> > Just to clarify, is that a distinction or just a clarification?  (ie
> > are ANSI and ISO SQL different?)
> 
> There is no "ANSI SQL".  Only ISO SQL.  ANSI never issued their own
> spec to my knowledge ... unlike, say, C, where I believe ANSI C was
> in fact issued by ANSI.

TODO updated.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-03-24 03:39:27
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Previous:From: Ron MayerDate: 2005-03-24 00:02:33
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group