Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PORTS] 8.0.0rc4 / OpenBSD 3.6 / amd64 success

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andy Warner <andy(at)andy(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PORTS] 8.0.0rc4 / OpenBSD 3.6 / amd64 success
Date: 2005-01-15 08:33:51
Message-ID: 200501150933.51480.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
Andy Warner wrote:
> I'm not sure what form success reports are supposed to take.
> I glanced at the website and didn't see anything obvious, but
> I didn't dig too hard.

See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-12/msg00314.php 
for the information we would like to see.

Also, cross-posting will not make your report noticed better..

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Stuart BishopDate: 2005-01-16 06:30:11
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 4
Previous:From: lsunleyDate: 2005-01-15 00:58:23
Subject: Re: Warp

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-01-15 13:31:42
Subject: Re: sparse (static analyzer) report
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-15 08:02:45
Subject: Re: sparse (static analyzer) report

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group