Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Update "Requirements" for Windows?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Update "Requirements" for Windows?
Date: 2004-12-24 18:12:37
Message-ID: 200412241812.iBOICbu04587@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers-win32
Tom Lane wrote:
> In the Administrator's Guide, first section under Installation, it still
> says
> 
> * To build on Windows NT or Windows 2000 you need the Cygwin and cygipc
>   packages. See the file doc/FAQ_MSWIN for details.
> 
> I suppose this is at least partly out of date, but what should it say
> now?
> 
> Also, do we even still need the "Installation on Windows" section?  Is
> anyone still going to care about building the frontend tools that way?

Oh, I see this needs some major restructuring/relabeling.  I am working
on that now.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-24 18:28:46
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Update "Requirements" for Windows?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-24 17:43:02
Subject: Update "Requirements" for Windows?

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-24 18:28:03
Subject: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-24 17:43:02
Subject: Update "Requirements" for Windows?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group