* Richard Rowell (richard(at)bowmansystems(dot)com) wrote:
> I have included an EXPLAIN ANALYZE, relevant table counts, and relevant
> indexing information. If anyone has any suggestions on how to improve
> performance.... TIA!
Just a thought- do the UNION's actually have to be union's or would
having them be 'UNION ALL's work?
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Jon Anderson||Date: 2004-12-16 17:08:20|
|Subject: Seqscan rather than Index|
|Previous:||From: John A Meinel||Date: 2004-12-16 16:59:05|
|Subject: Re: Improve performance of query|