Re: pg_restore - added documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore - added documentation
Date: 2004-10-13 14:32:31
Message-ID: 200410131632.31304.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, wording updated and applied. I used "process" instead of
> "issue".

I think this is drifting farther and farther from the target... Does
anyone else have a wording suggestion?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-13 14:37:12 Re: pg_restore - added documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-13 14:24:53 Re: pg_restore - added documentation