Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 23:24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
> >>> and approves it.
> >> does this reflect a change in the patch application procedures?
> In my mind this is just a clearer statement of what the policy always
> was ;-). The patch review/application load was never supposed to fall
> entirely on Bruce. The list he maintains is just there to ensure that
> nothing slips through the cracks.
Yes, I welcome others to apply patches from the queue --- in fact I
encourage it. I think we need one person making sure no patches are
lost (that role doesn't distribute well) but we don't need to have one
person applying patches from that queue.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-09-17 14:36:41|
|Subject: Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2004-09-17 13:56:09|
|Subject: Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0|