On Friday August 27 2004 12:51, Ed L. wrote:
> On Friday August 27 2004 12:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> > BTW, as long as we are taking Apache as the de facto standard --- does
> > the default of "postgresql-%Y-%m-%d_%H%M%S.log" actually make sense, or
> > would something different be closer to the common practice with Apache?
>
> Apache defaults to access_log.N where N is the epoch of the logfile start
> time.
I should say, Apache rotatelogs takes a configurable filename and then
appends ".N" where N is the logfile start time epoch. In one case, its
access_log.N, in another its error_log.N.
Ed