Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql-server: > Please find enclose a submission to

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: > Please find enclose a submission to
Date: 2004-08-21 00:12:53
Message-ID: 200408210012.i7L0CrI27820@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Peter has replied to previous patches so I assume he would have
> > commented on this one if he didn't like it.  It was already adjusted to
> > take Peter's comments into account.
> 
> The question is has anyone reviewed it?  I certainly haven't, because
> I was expecting Peter to review it (and commit it if appropriate).
> 
> When we are in beta I do not think the default action for submitted
> patches should be "apply unless someone objects".  We need a higher
> standard in this period, ie, actual careful review.

OK, Peter, you want to look at that patch?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-21 00:26:54
Subject: pgsql-server: Recent tightening of allowed array-literal syntax broke
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-21 00:09:10
Subject: pgsql-server: Whack btree_gist code around until it has some small hope

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group