Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Peter has replied to previous patches so I assume he would have
> > commented on this one if he didn't like it. It was already adjusted to
> > take Peter's comments into account.
> The question is has anyone reviewed it? I certainly haven't, because
> I was expecting Peter to review it (and commit it if appropriate).
> When we are in beta I do not think the default action for submitted
> patches should be "apply unless someone objects". We need a higher
> standard in this period, ie, actual careful review.
OK, Peter, you want to look at that patch?
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-08-21 00:26:54|
|Subject: pgsql-server: Recent tightening of allowed array-literal syntax broke |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-08-21 00:09:10|
|Subject: pgsql-server: Whack btree_gist code around until it has some small hope |